1 month ago
5
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order to establish a Religious Liberty Commission to safeguard and promote religious freedom in America.
👥 Who’s Involved: The Commission will include TV personality Dr. Phil McGraw as chairman, ex officio government officials, clergy, legal experts, academics, and public advocates.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: Announced on Thursday in the United States.
💬 Key Quote: “I can’t tell you how proud I am to see religion coming back to the White House. God bless you for doing this.” — Dr. Phil McGraw.
⚠️ Impact: The initiative aims to address threats to religious liberty, enhance protections for future generations, and advise on relevant policies.
IN FULL:
President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order on May 1 to form the Religious Liberty Commission, a move aimed at reinforcing and protecting the principle of religious freedom in the United States. This newly established Commission plans to delve into issues affecting religious liberty and propose strategies to safeguard and enhance these rights for future generations.
The Commission will be chaired by TV personality Dr. Phil McGraw. It will see additional participation from government officials, clergy, legal experts, and public advocates. Its mission encompasses producing a thorough report on the historical foundations of religious liberty, strategies to maintain a peaceful religious pluralism, and identification of threats to religious freedom. It is also tasked with recommending policies to uphold these liberties.
“I can’t tell you how proud I am to see religion coming back to the White House. God bless you for doing this,” McGraw said on May 1. “This is a man that wants this country to have a heart and have religion,” he added.
Among the key focus areas are parental rights in religious education, school choice, and protections of religious expressions and institutions. Furthermore, the Commission is expected to collaborate with the White House Faith Office and the Domestic Policy Council to offer guidance on related policies.
Joe Biden-era federal measures and state-level measures in Democrat-led states have undermined religious freedoms, particularly for Christians, targeting conscience protections and threatening funding for faith-based entities.
The Trump administration’s efforts to correct this include ongoing federal initiatives against anti-Semitism and establishing a White House Faith Office. Additionally, a “Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias” has been created at the Department of Justice (DOJ).
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration cannot use the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to detain or deport a group of Venezuelan illegal immigrants from a Texas facility.
👥 Who’s Involved: U.S. District Court Judge Fernando Rodriguez, the Trump administration, Venezuelan illegal immigrants alleged to be part of the Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: Southern Texas, with the ruling issued on Thursday, May 1.
💬 Key Quote: Judge Rodriguez claims the president’s invocation of the AEA through proclamation “exceeds the scope of the statute and is contrary to the plain, ordinary meaning of the statute’s terms.”
⚠️ Impact: The administration is barred from using the AEA and Trump’s proclamation to detain or remove the migrants, but removal proceedings can still proceed under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
IN FULL:
A federal judge has ruled that President Donald J. Trump‘s March 15 proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to expedite the deportation of illegal immigrants residing in the United States exceeds the statutory authority laid out in the law. U.S. District Court Judge Fernando Rodriguez—appointed to the bench in 2018 during Trump’s first term in office—issued the decision on Thursday, determining that the America First leader cannot use the AEA as a legal justification for holding or deporting illegal immigrants either residing or detained in the jurisdiction of the Southern District of Texas.
“The Proclamation makes no reference to and in no manner suggests that a threat exists of an organized, armed group of individuals entering the United States at the direction of Venezuela to conquer the country or assume control over a portion of the nation,” Rodriguez wrote in his ruling. He continued: “Thus, the Proclamation’s language cannot be read as describing conduct that falls within the meaning of ‘invasion’ for purposes of the AEA.”
“Neither the Court nor the parties question that the Executive Branch can direct the detention and removal of aliens who engage in criminal activity in the United States… The question that this lawsuit presents is whether the president can utilize a specific statute, the AEA, to detain and remove Venezuelan aliens who are members of TdA,” the judge continued, concluding: “As to that question, the historical record renders clear that the president’s invocation of the AEA through the proclamation exceeds the scope of the statute and is contrary to the plain, ordinary meaning of the statute’s terms.”
Notably, Tren de Aragua has been officially designated as a foreign terrorist organization, and the FBI reportedly has evidence that the Venezuelan government is aiding its infiltration of the U.S.
The lawsuit, initially filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the subsequent ruling come as a blow to the Trump White House’s push to swiftly deport dangerous, criminal illegal immigrants. Should the administration appeal Judge Rodriguez’s decision, the conservative-dominated 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New Orleans, would hear the case. However, the 5th Circuit has shown a penchant in the past to rule against actions it sees as constitutional overreach by the Executive Branch, especially on the issue of immigration. Previously, the appellate court ruled against measures enacted by former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama aimed at allowing illegal immigrants to remain in the country.
Notably, Judge Rodriguez took over the case from James Boasberg, who serves as the chief judge for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The change in venue and judge occurred after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that legal challenges to President Trump’s deportations can only be filed in the court district where the deported person resides or is detained. In addition, the Supreme Court determined that lower court rulings on the matter only apply to the judge’s respective judicial district.
While still presiding over the case earlier this year, Judge Boasberg issued a temporary halt to the deportation of illegal Venezuelan immigrants under the AEA in a bizarre order that demanded the Trump administration recall two planes that were over international waters carrying deportees to El Salvador.
show less
English (US) ·