2 months ago
3
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: The state of Michigan has decided not to comply with a directive from the Department of Education demanding schools eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
👥 Who’s Involved: President Donald J. Trump, Michigan Superintendent Michael Rice, Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: Michigan, United States.
💬 Key Quote: Michigan State Superintendent Michael Rice insisted, “Pre-K-12 programs that promote diversity representing all children, regardless of race, and inclusion of all children, regardless of race, do not inherently harm particular groups of children and are not de facto violations of Title VI.”
⚠️ Impact: This position underscores Michigan’s commitment to DEI initiatives, while other states, like Indiana, have chosen to comply with federal directives. The national discourse on the legality and value of DEI initiatives in education continues.
IN FULL:
Michigan is rejecting a federally imposed directive demanding schools cut diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. The move comes in response to a recent memo from the Department of Education. The Trump administration’s directive urged schools nationwide to align with its interpretation of federal civil rights law, which limits the use of racial considerations in education settings.
Michigan State Superintendent Michael Rice asserts that the state adheres to all federal civil rights mandates. He emphasized the importance of DEI efforts, proclaiming them both lawful and vital. Rice contends that “Pre-K-12 programs that promote diversity representing all children, regardless of race, and inclusion of all children, regardless of race, do not inherently harm particular groups of children and are not de facto violations of Title VI.”
The February memo from the Department of Education mandates that educational institutions cease using racial preferences in decisions regarding admissions and scholarships and outlines potential consequences for noncompliance, including investigations or loss of federal funding. However, a number of state education leaders have joined Michigan in resisting the Trump administration directive, including in Colorado, New York, Pennsylvania, and Illinois. Each state claims it already meets federal civil rights guidelines.
Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor argues that DEI initiatives lead to discrimination, favoring one group over another. “For decades, schools have been operating on the pretext that selecting students for ‘diversity’ or similar euphemisms is not selecting them based on race. No longer. Students should be assessed according to merit, accomplishment, and character—not prejudged by the color of their skin,” Trainor stated in February. He warned: “The Office for Civil Rights will enforce that commitment.”
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: The commander of a U.S. military base in Greenland was dismissed after reportedly sending an email in opposition to remarks made by Vice President J.D. Vance during his visit to the Arctic territory.
👥 Who’s Involved: Colonel Susannah Meyers, Vice President J.D. Vance, President Donald J. Trump, and the Pentagon.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: The incident took place at the Pituffik Space Base, Greenland, with Meyers being relieved of her duties on April 10, 2025, following her email sent on March 31, 2025.
💬 Key Quote: “I do not presume to understand current politics, but what I do know is the concerns of the U.S. administration discussed by Vice President Vance on Friday are not reflective of Pituffik Space Base,” Meyers reportedly stated in her email.
⚠️ Impact: Meyers’s dismissal highlights tensions between the Trump administration and politicized military leaders.
IN FULL:
Colonel Susannah Meyers, who led the U.S. military’s Pituffik Space Base in Greenland, has been removed from her post by the Pentagon. This decision follows her alleged distribution of an email that challenged Vice President J.D. Vance‘s comments during his visit to the territory. The Pentagon expressed that actions undermining command structure or the president’s objectives are intolerable.
Meyers communicated with base personnel that she spent the weekend contemplating the implications of Vance’s statements regarding U.S. policy towards Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark, to which the island currently belongs. “I do not presume to understand current politics, but what I do know is the concerns of the U.S. administration discussed by Vice President Vance on Friday are not reflective of Pituffik Space Base,” Meyers wrote, adding: “I commit that, for as long as I am lucky enough to lead this base, all of our flags will fly proudly—together.”
Concerningly, Meyers’s email was distributed to all base personnel, including non-military staff from Denmark and Greenland. A military officer undermining the policy stance of the U.S. government’s executive branch is considered a serious matter that is not casually brushed aside.
The move coincides with President Donald J. Trump’s renewed interest in acquiring Greenland from Denmark. Vice President Vance’s remarks in Greenland on March 28 called for the Arctic island’s independence—supported by most of its inhabitants, who are largely not ethnic Danes—and criticized Denmark’s security measures for the region. Vance’s statements urged Greenlanders towards self-determination, suggesting potential partnership benefits with the U.S.
Denmark’s leadership, including Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, has condemned the tone and content of these overtures. After Vance’s visit, Rasmussen indicated that while open to constructive criticism, the approach taken by the U.S. administration was unwelcome.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) revealed that a group of 6,300 individuals admitted into the U.S. under the Biden regime were identified to have criminal records or were on the terrorist watchlist and subsequently able to obtain government benefits like Medicaid.
👥 Who’s Involved: The individuals were processed by Border Patrol and identified by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) during Joe Biden’s term of office.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: These incidents have been occurring since at least 2023 within the United States.
💬 Key Quote: The Department of Government Efficiency stated that these paroles “have since been terminated with immediate effect.”
⚠️ Impact: Paroled individuals were able to receive social security numbers and file for work authorization. It was found that 905 individuals accessed Medicaid, 41 collected unemployment benefits, 22 received federal student loans, 409 received tax refunds, and several benefited from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payouts.
IN FULL:
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has identified a cohort of 6,300 individuals admitted into the United States without legal status who are listed on the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Terrorist Screening Center watchlist or possess criminal records. According to DOGE, almost all of these illegal immigrants were admitted and paroled into the United States by the former Biden government.
Despite lacking official legal status, these paroled individuals filed for work permits and were granted social security numbers. Subsequently, they were able to obtain access to various government benefits, raising concerns regarding eligibility and oversight failures.
Among the identified 6,300 people, 905 were found to be registered for Medicaid, including four individuals on the terrorist watchlist, accruing $276,000 in expenses. Additionally, 41 individuals collected unemployment insurance worth $42,000, and 22 had federal student loans totaling $280,000.
Furthermore, 409 individuals received tax refunds totaling $751,000 in 2024 alone. Several have also reportedly accessed benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) program, commonly known as food stamps. The investigation into the exact number of SNAP recipients continues.
The Department of Government Efficiency stated that these paroles “have since been terminated with immediate effect.” However, the revelations have prompted questions within the government regarding the rigor of current screening processes and the mechanisms in place for vetting individuals.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: Independent journalist and anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson has requested early release from prison, claiming his confinement is negatively affecting his health.
👥 Who’s Involved: Robinson, his lawyers, barrister Alisdair Williamson KC, the Solicitor General represented by Aidan Eardley KC, and Baroness Sue Carr, the Lady Chief Justice.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: Robinson is held at His Majesty’s Prison (HMP) Woodhill, Milton Keynes. The appeal was submitted recently, following an 18-month sentence imposed last year.
💬 Key Quote: “He is being kept safe by the authorities in segregation, but being kept safe is making him ill,” argued Robinson’s barrister.
⚠️ Impact: A judicial ruling on Robinson’s appeal is expected later, with potential implications for prison management of inmates with mental health concerns.
IN FULL:
Anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson has approached the Court of Appeal to request early release from prison, citing adverse effects on his health due to his current confinement conditions. Robinson is serving an 18-month sentence for contempt of court.
Robinson’s incarceration results from breaching a court order after an expensive 2021 libel lawsuit over the fact he had accused a Syrian migrant of violent behavior. Despite the court order banning him from repeating the accusations, Robinson released the documentary Silenced, which interviewed local people who interacted with the Syrian, in defense of his claims. However, the film’s release was deemed contempt by the courts after the government went out of its way to bring a contempt case against him.
During the recent appeal hearing, his barrister Alisdair Williamson KC highlighted evidence pointing to Robinson’s struggles with complex post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and ADHD. This medical case forms the basis for seeking a modification of his current isolation for safety reasons, which is reportedly worsening his condition. “He is being kept safe by the authorities in segregation, but being kept safe is making him ill,” said Williamson.
Placed in a closed section of the prison, Robinson is granted limited interaction with others. While he has access to various facilities, his routine is considerably restricted, intensifying concerns from his legal team about his psychological well-being.
Representing the Solicitor General, Aidan Eardley KC countered these assertions, arguing that the prison’s conditions are not more severe than initially expected. The court adjourned without a decision on the appeal. Senior judges are expected to deliver their ruling at a later date.
Image by Shayan Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: A federal judge ruled in favor of the Trump administration, requiring anyone in the U.S. illegally to register with the federal government and carry documentation.
👥 Who’s Involved: Judge Trevor Neil McFadden, President Donald J. Trump, and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem were central figures in this ruling, alongside the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: The ruling occurred in a federal court and will go into effect Friday.
💬 Key Quote: DHS Secretary Kristi Noem stated, “President Trump and I have a clear message for those in our country illegally: leave now. If you leave now, you may have the opportunity to return and enjoy our freedom and live the American dream.”
⚠️ Impact: The ruling enforces a longstanding requirement, extending to non-U.S. citizens who must register and provide fingerprints. Noncompliance can lead to fines, imprisonment, or deportation.
IN FULL:
A federal judge upheld the Trump administration’s policy requiring individuals in the U.S. illegally to register with federal authorities and carry documentation or else face stiff financial and criminal penalties. On Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Trevor Neil McFadden ruled that a group challenging this requirement lacked the standing necessary for their claims to be considered. The decision will begin to take effect on Friday.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) emphasized that individuals without legal status who have been within U.S. borders for longer than 30 days must comply with this registration requirement. “President Trump and I have a clear message for those in our country illegally: leave now. If you leave now, you may have the opportunity to return and enjoy our freedom and live the American dream,” DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said, reiterating that illegal immigrants should leave the United States before they are either forcibly deported or face other legal action.
President Donald J. Trump‘s imposition of the registration requirement and financial penalties for those who fail to comply is rooted in provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. The legislation outlines various measures to monitor illegal immigrants and encourage them to depart voluntarily.
Adhering to these provisions requires anyone aged 14 and older without legal status to provide their fingerprints and current address. Canadians staying in the U.S. for over 30 days also fall under this mandate. The Trump administration underscores the importance of these laws for maintaining national safety and security.
The registration concept isn’t new, having been applied more stringently after September 11, 2001. Back then, males 16 and older from select countries were required to register, a program that was later suspended in 2011 and ultimately dissolved in 2016.
The DHS has been proactive in notifying illegal immigrants since February, warning of substantial consequences for those who fail to comply.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: China increased tariffs on U.S. goods to 125 percent in response to U.S. tariff hikes on Chinese products.
👥 Who’s Involved: China, the United States, President Donald J. Trump, and the Chinese Ministry of Finance.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: The announcement was made on Friday.
💬 Key Quote: “The U.S.’s imposition of abnormally high tariffs on China seriously violates international economic and trade rules…” claims China’s Ministry of Finance.
⚠️ Impact: U.S. products, including soybeans, pharmaceutical drugs, and airplanes, are affected; tensions between the two nations rise, with implications for international trade systems.
IN FULL:
Beijing is striking back against the United States, imposing a 125 percent tariff on American goods. The move follows U.S. President Donald J. Trump clarifying on Thursday that the effective tariff rate on Chinese imports now stands at 145 percent, up from the previous 125 percent.
Among American goods falling under the new Chinese import duties are soybeans, pharmaceuticals, and aircraft. The duty on soybeans is likely to be the most impactful, as while China exports far more to the United States than it imports, the American goods that China does buy tend to be agricultural.
In announcing the new trade measures, the Chinese Ministry of Finance accused the United States of violating international trade norms and engaging in economic coercion. “The U.S.’s imposition of abnormally high tariffs on China seriously violates international economic and trade rules,” claimed the ministry.
The U.S. had cited China’s involvement in the fentanyl trade as a factor for the tariff increase. President Donald J. Trump has been vocal about what he perceives as China’s long-standing unfair trade practices against the U.S., cautioning Beijing against further retaliation. Trump’s recent statements emphasize the need for China to recognize that its economic practices are unsustainable.
In response to the U.S. tariffs, Chinese officials maintain that the new rates leave no viable market for American exports to China. “If the U.S. continues to impose tariffs on Chinese goods exported to the U.S., China will ignore it,” the Chinese ministry remarked. However, it is important to note that China—a surplus economy—is far more reliant on the U.S. purchasing Chinese goods than vice-versa.
China appears to have halted efforts to defend its currency, the yuan Renminbi, against the U.S. tariffs. After initially devaluing earlier in the week, the yuan began to appreciate again last night. Notably, the Chinese purposefully devalue the yuan to give the country’s exports a competitive advantage in global trade.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: Zimbabwe’s government has distributed initial compensation payments to white farmers whose land was expropriated under the late dictator Robert Mugabe.
👥 Who’s Involved: The payments are directed to 378 farmers; the Zimbabwean government is undertaking the compensation.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: The compensation process is part of a 2020 agreement; the payouts occur in Zimbabwe.
💬 Key Quote: “One of our commitments as we try to reform the Zimbabwe economy, to clear our arrears, is really to compensate the former farm owners who lost their farms during the land reform program. We have now begun to honor that agreement.” — Finance Minister Mthuli Ncube.
⚠️ Impact: The payments represent a step toward addressing past grievances but cover only a small fraction of the total compensation agreed upon.
IN FULL:
White farmers in Zimbabwe began receiving initial compensation for the land confiscated from them by the late dictator Robert Mugabe more than two decades ago. The authorities announced an initial disbursement of $2.9 million to cover the first 378 farmers approved for compensation.
This payout is part of a broader effort pledged in 2020 when Zimbabwe committed to compensating farmers with a $3.3 billion package for land taken during the seizures, in which whites were forcibly dispossessed and, in some cases, killed.
This initial allocation represents a modest fraction of the approximately $310 million total earmarked for compensation. Out of 740 eligible former farm owners, the distribution addresses the claims of a portion while others await further processing. Harry Orphanides, a representative for some of these farmers, disclosed that interest has grown among more landholders to participate in the compensation scheme.
The government directed compensation solely towards enhancements made on the expropriated properties, declining to account for the value of the land itself. The justification for this ties the land’s ownership to unjust acquisition by colonial powers.
President Emmerson Mnangagwa, succeeding Mugabe after a coup in 2017, is making this effort to mend relations with Western nations, with diplomatic ties strained by Zimbabwe’s previous land policies. The seizures also resulted in food production collapsing in the country and a significant economic crisis.
The move comes as neighboring South Africa is going in the opposite direction. The country is threatening to seize land from white South Africans without compensation, causing rocky relations between the government and the United States, where President Donald J. Trump has offered a pathway to citizenship for white farmers and their families.
Last month, the South African ambassador was dismissed by the White House after referring to President Trump as a white supremacist.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: The Kennedy Center set an all-time attendance record with a fireworks show.
👥 Who’s Involved: The Kennedy Center, President Donald J. Trump, Ric Grenell.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: March 29, the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C.
💬 Key Quote: “It was wonderful to have so many new visitors at the Kennedy Center for Cai Guo-Qiang’s firework showcase. We look forward to their return for more wonderful programming soon,” said the Kennedy Center’s Vice President of Public Relations Roma Darav.
⚠️ Impact: A shift away from politically charged, leftist programming has broadened The Kennedy Center’s appeal and audience.
IN FULL:
The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, colloquially known as The Kennedy Center, has set an all-time public attendance record under executive director Ric Grenell—appointment by President Donald J. Trump, who also serves as chairman of the center’s board. An estimated 11,000 people attended the March 29 “EARTH to SPACE: Arts Breaking the Sky” fireworks display held on the Kennedy Center grounds.
“It was wonderful to have so many new visitors at the Kennedy Center for Cai Guo-Qiang’s firework showcase. We look forward to their return for more wonderful programming soon,” The Kennedy Center’s Vice President of Public Relations Roma Darav said, adding: “Everyone is welcome here!”
While Hollywood celebrities and New York theater socialites bemoaned Trump’s takeover of the Kennedy Center, the America First leader swiftly depoliticized the arts and entertainment institution. President Trump and his administration contend that the overly leftist and “woke” programming featured at the Kennedy Center in recent years turned off regular tourists and other attendees, reducing the number of guests at concerts, operas, and musical and theater performances.
Notably, the fireworks show saw a crowd of 76 percent first-time attendees, a positive sign of the Kennedy Center, which, like other theater and opera venues, has struggled post-COVID-19 pandemic.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: Charges filed in Florida against Ryan Routh for an alleged assassination attempt on President Donald J. Trump.
👥 Who’s Involved: Ryan Routh, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, President Donald J. Trump, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: Assassination attempt at West Palm Beach golf course, Florida; charges announced on Thursday.
💬 Key Quote: Uthmeier highlighted Bondi’s role, stating she was “instrumental in preserving Florida’s sovereign authority to do what is right and bring justice where it is due.”
⚠️ Impact: Routh faces serious charges, including first-degree attempted murder and terrorism.
IN FULL:
Florida’s Attorney General, James Uthmeier, announced on Thursday that Ryan Routh is being charged in connection with his alleged assassination attempt on President Donald J. Trump. The charges come after difficulties were noted in prosecuting the case under the former Biden-Harris regime, according to Uthmeier. He acknowledged the efforts of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi in maintaining Florida’s ability to bring the prosecution, indicating her role as crucial in the proceedings.
Ryan Routh has been charged with first-degree attempted murder and a terrorism offense. Law enforcement alleges that Routh had intentions to target Trump while he was at his golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida, during the 2024 election campaign.
This incident has led to attention on the security measures surrounding the President, especially in relation to his frequent visits to the golf course in West Palm Beach. Following Routh’s arrest, President Trump briefly halted his golfing activities but resumed them following his election victory last November.
Routh is also being charged with similar crimes on the federal level, with his trial yet to begin. Court documents revealed earlier his week showed that he attempted to source anti-aircraft missiles from Ukraine to target President Trump’s private aircraft.
Having served as an attempted recruiter of foreign mercenaries for Ukraine, Routh had deep ties to the Eastern European country and has visited it extensively, also having contacts with the Ukrainian military.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: A judge allowed a defamation lawsuit against President Donald J. Trump to proceed.
👥 Who’s Involved: President Trump, Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Kevin Richardson, Antron Brown, Korey Wise, and Judge Wendy Beetlestone.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: Philadelphia, ruling made on Thursday.
💬 Key Quote: “The Plaintiffs seek to correct the record and clear their names once again,” said Shanin Specter, lawyer for the plaintiffs.
⚠️ Impact: The case looks to address Trump’s statements about the plaintiffs during the 2024 presidential election.
IN FULL:
President Donald J. Trump is facing a defamation lawsuit concerning statements about the Central Park Five after a federal judge on Thursday determined the legal action can proceed. Philadelphia-based U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone ruled that the claims presented sufficient evidence to advance.
The lawsuit was initiated in October by five individuals—Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Kevin Richardson, Antron Brown, and Korey Wise—who were convicted in 1989 of brutally attacking and sexually assaulting a female jogger in Central Park. They were exonerated in 2002 after a confession by another man, accompanied by DNA evidence linking him to the victim’s sexual assault—although it remains unclear whether others may have played a role in the attack prior to the sexual assault.
The victim remains convinced that more than one person was involved, and police and prosecutors have defended their case against the Five.
The legal action claims that Trump made false and damaging statements about the group. In the past, Trump had publicly advocated for the death penalty for the men. During the 2024 presidential campaign, he asserted that the Five had confessed to murder—a claim they deny. Trump’s legal defense maintains that his remarks are shielded by First Amendment rights.
The controversy was a focal topic during a presidential debate between Trump and then-Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump insisted that the Central Park Five had admitted guilt, linking them to severe violence against a victim and suggesting contradictions in their pleas.
However, Judge Beetlestone believes that “an objective assessment” would classify Trump’s statement as false. The plaintiffs’ attorney, Shanin Specter, reiterated the group’s efforts to rectify public perception and clear their reputations following the lawsuit’s filing.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: Republican Rep. Lance Gooden endorsed Ken Paxton in the Texas GOP Senate primary against longtime Sen. John Cornyn.
👥 Who’s Involved: Rep. Lance Gooden, Sen. John Cornyn, Attorney General Ken Paxton, President Donald Trump, Texas Rep. Troy Nehls, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, and Sen. Tim Scott.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: The endorsement was made in Texas on Thursday.
💬 Key Quote: “Attorney General Paxton is the conservative champion we need in the U.S. Senate,” stated Rep. Lance Gooden.
⚠️ Impact: The endorsement increases pressure in a primary that could turn into a costly and contentious contest. The GOP primary winner will likely be favored in the general election.
IN FULL:
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton‘s Republican primary bid against U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) is receiving some early support. Congressman Lance Gooden (R-TX), who represents parts of Eastern Dallas and is known for his MAGA allegiance, announced he is endorsing Paxton for Senate—a sign that populist and Trump-backing Republicans in the state could soon follow suit. The Texas Republican primary for the U.S. Senate is anticipated to be particularly contentious and costly.
Paxton, who has served as Attorney General since 2014, announced his Senate run earlier this week. He cites a need for change and a stronger representation of conservative values. He argues for aligning more closely with President Donald J. Trump’s agenda. Paxton has accused Cornyn of failing to support conservative principles and questions his loyalty to Trump.
Cornyn, a member of the Senate since 2002, has backing from significant Republican figures, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune. The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRCC) also endorses Cornyn. However, while he claimd that his voting record shows steadfast support for Trump’s policies, he initially opposed his bid to reclaim the presidency in 2024, and argued congressional Republicans should not oppose the lawfare prosecutions of America First leader.
While Trump could weigh in on the race with an endorsement—likely all but deciding the primary’s winner—such an action appears unlikely at the moment. Paxton’s campaign is characterized by his stance as a staunch conservative and ally to Trump, and the Trump-style lawfare against him—including an attempted but failed impeachment pushed by establishment Republicans and Democrats in the Texas legislature.
Despite the attention currently on Paxton and Cornyn, Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-TX) could also enter the race.
show less
English (US) · 