1 month ago
6
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: Federal charges have been brought against two Ukrainians for allegedly voting illegally in the 2024 U.S. presidential election as noncitizens.
👥 Who’s Involved: The individuals are Svitlana Demydenko, 53, and her daughter, Yelyzaveta Demydenko, 22, both Ukrainian nationals. The prosecution involves the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Homeland Security Investigations, and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: The charges were filed in federal court in Palm Beach, Florida. The women appeared before a federal judge in West Palm Beach on April 29, 2024. The voting in question occurred on October 31, 2024.
💬 Key Quote: The Department of Justice stated that the women “voted from Palm Beach in the federal 2024 General Election, which included election of a United States President.”
⚠️ Impact: This case highlights the Trump administration’s focus on election integrity, particularly its push to ensure only citizens participate in voting following concerns about noncitizen voter registration.
IN FULL:
Federal prosecutors are charging two Ukrainian nationals with unlawfully casting ballots in the 2024 U.S. presidential election. According to the Department of Justice (DOJ), Svitlana Demydenko, 53, and her daughter Yelyzaveta, 22, were brought before a federal court on April 29 to face charges related to voting as noncitizens.
The Demydenkos, who entered the United States on nonimmigrant visas in April 2021, successfully registered to vote in August 2024. This registration was conducted through a system requiring prospective voters to affirm their U.S. citizenship. Despite this requirement, they allegedly cast ballots during early voting on October 31, in Palm Beach, within the federal general elections, which included the presidential race.
U.S. Attorney Hayden P. O’Byrne for the Southern District of Florida, Acting Special Agent in Charge Jose R. Figueroa of Homeland Security Investigations in Miami, and Florida Department of Law Enforcement Commissioner Mark Glass announced the charges. Additionally, the DOJ says the investigation was supported by various entities, including the Florida Department of State’s Office of Election Crimes and Security, Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections, the U.S. Diplomatic Security Service, and the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Meanwhile, Assistant U.S. Attorney John McMillan is spearheading the ongoing prosecution. Notably, the incident arrives amidst efforts, particularly championed by Republican lawmakers, to ensure only citizens engage in federal voting following historical concerns regarding voter registration by noncitizens during former President Joe Biden’s term in office.
PULSE POINTS:
❓What Happened: A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration cannot use the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to detain or deport a group of Venezuelan illegal immigrants from a Texas facility.
👥 Who’s Involved: U.S. District Court Judge Fernando Rodriguez, the Trump administration, Venezuelan illegal immigrants alleged to be part of the Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
📍 Where & When: Southern Texas, with the ruling issued on Thursday, May 1.
💬 Key Quote: Judge Rodriguez claims the president’s invocation of the AEA through proclamation “exceeds the scope of the statute and is contrary to the plain, ordinary meaning of the statute’s terms.”
⚠️ Impact: The administration is barred from using the AEA and Trump’s proclamation to detain or remove the migrants, but removal proceedings can still proceed under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
IN FULL:
A federal judge has ruled that President Donald J. Trump‘s March 15 proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to expedite the deportation of illegal immigrants residing in the United States exceeds the statutory authority laid out in the law. U.S. District Court Judge Fernando Rodriguez—appointed to the bench in 2018 during Trump’s first term in office—issued the decision on Thursday, determining that the America First leader cannot use the AEA as a legal justification for holding or deporting illegal immigrants either residing or detained in the jurisdiction of the Southern District of Texas.
“The Proclamation makes no reference to and in no manner suggests that a threat exists of an organized, armed group of individuals entering the United States at the direction of Venezuela to conquer the country or assume control over a portion of the nation,” Rodriguez wrote in his ruling. He continued: “Thus, the Proclamation’s language cannot be read as describing conduct that falls within the meaning of ‘invasion’ for purposes of the AEA.”
“Neither the Court nor the parties question that the Executive Branch can direct the detention and removal of aliens who engage in criminal activity in the United States… The question that this lawsuit presents is whether the president can utilize a specific statute, the AEA, to detain and remove Venezuelan aliens who are members of TdA,” the judge continued, concluding: “As to that question, the historical record renders clear that the president’s invocation of the AEA through the proclamation exceeds the scope of the statute and is contrary to the plain, ordinary meaning of the statute’s terms.”
Notably, Tren de Aragua has been officially designated as a foreign terrorist organization, and the FBI reportedly has evidence that the Venezuelan government is aiding its infiltration of the U.S.
The lawsuit, initially filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the subsequent ruling come as a blow to the Trump White House’s push to swiftly deport dangerous, criminal illegal immigrants. Should the administration appeal Judge Rodriguez’s decision, the conservative-dominated 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New Orleans, would hear the case. However, the 5th Circuit has shown a penchant in the past to rule against actions it sees as constitutional overreach by the Executive Branch, especially on the issue of immigration. Previously, the appellate court ruled against measures enacted by former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama aimed at allowing illegal immigrants to remain in the country.
Notably, Judge Rodriguez took over the case from James Boasberg, who serves as the chief judge for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The change in venue and judge occurred after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that legal challenges to President Trump’s deportations can only be filed in the court district where the deported person resides or is detained. In addition, the Supreme Court determined that lower court rulings on the matter only apply to the judge’s respective judicial district.
While still presiding over the case earlier this year, Judge Boasberg issued a temporary halt to the deportation of illegal Venezuelan immigrants under the AEA in a bizarre order that demanded the Trump administration recall two planes that were over international waters carrying deportees to El Salvador.
show less
English (US) ·