Critics Bring Receipts After Musk Claims They 'Can't Point To Any' Controversial DOGE Cuts

3 months ago 4

Elon Musk is once again getting trounced on his own social media platform.

The billionaire tech mogul sat down Thursday with Fox News and addressed critics of his Department of Government Efficiency, which has been dismantling federal agencies in the name of reducing supposedly wasteful spending, and made one particularly baffling claim.

Musk told anchor Bret Baier that DOGE carefully considers which agencies to gut and how many staffers to fire, and claimed even unnamed Democrats “occasionally” express their appreciation for what some have called the “hollowing out” of the U.S. government.

“But usually when they attack DOGE, they never attack any of the specifics,” he added. “So they will say what we’re doing is somehow unconstitutional or illegal, or whatever. We’re like, ‘Which line of the cost savings do you disagree with?’ And they can’t point to any.”

A clip of the moment has since gone viral on Musk’s platform X, formerly Twitter, where untold users — including lawmakers like Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) and political pundits like Mehdi Hasan — called Musk’s bluff by producing the specifics he asked for.

“Erm, how about cuts to school nutrition funding?” wrote Hasan. “Or mosquito nets to fight malaria? Or Social Security offices that are now closing? Or cuts to funding to fight measles in Texas? Or the canceling of long-term study into diabetes? Specific enough?”

“Hey @elonmusk: I am specifically against closing Social Security offices and phone lines so seniors can’t get checks,” wrote Casar. “I’m also specifically against cutting funding for cancer research, firing veterans, and firing nuclear safety workers. Hope this helps!”

Musk: But, usually when they attack DOGE, they never attack any of the specifics. So they will say what we're doing is somehow unconstitutional or illegal or whatever. We are like well, which line of the cost savings do you disagree with? And they can't point to any pic.twitter.com/yICi4UfvrY

— Acyn (@Acyn) March 27, 2025

Musk spent a quarter-billion dollars to help reelect President Donald Trump and was made a “special government employee” tasked with finding federal fraud, waste and abuse. His chaotic approach, however, has since spawned numerous lawsuits against DOGE.

When asked Wednesday if the process “still involves Congress,” Musk said he and his DOGE team “try to keep Congress informed as much as possible,” but suggested they don’t actually need to — as “it’s not contrary to Congress to avoid waste and fraud.”

Musk has been getting eviscerated on X for his claims, with one user writing: “If the savings come from gutting safety teams, bypassing oversight, or ignoring labor standards, then the outrage is earned. Saving money by cutting corners isn’t efficiency, it’s negligence.”

There’s no shortage of similar comments on X, which Musk acquired in 2022 for $44 billion.

I point to the same specific every time:
there isn’t a single forensic accountant on the DOGE team.
Not. One.

Seems to me that if fraud is what you’re attempting to gut, you’d need a forensic auditor to gather solid and traceable evidence in order to prosecute those who…

— Molotov Cocktail (@MollyCocktail) March 27, 2025

Critics: “This might be unconstitutional.”

Musk: “But did you see how many people I fired?”

— Nikos (@NikosReggae) March 27, 2025

He can’t be serious. They have sued DOGE almost department by department and with a lot of specifics

— Mayowa A. Balogun (@Sweeegu) March 27, 2025

We Don't Work For Billionaires. We Work For You.

Big money interests are running the government — and influencing the news you read. While other outlets are retreating behind paywalls and bending the knee to political pressure, HuffPost is proud to be unbought and unfiltered. Will you help us keep it that way? You can even access our stories ad-free.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest — we could use your help again. We won't back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can't do it without you.

For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you'll join us.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest — we could use your help again. We won't back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can't do it without you.

For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you'll join us.

Support HuffPost

Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.

He is deflecting—a vague claim ignores real concerns about ethics, legality, and transparency. Cost savings don’t justify violating laws, bypassing oversight, or undermining public services. If critics raise constitutional or legal issues, dismissing them without addressing…

— Nothing lasts forever! (@Nto79549105) March 27, 2025

This is just … straight up incorrect? The DOGE critics have been taking issue with specific cuts constantly, sometimes to Elon directly

And yeah, there are also the more general critiques: the chaotic process, the potential illegality of it

He’s not even trying to understand https://t.co/DRzV7zeLR8

— Sam Clench (@SamClench) March 28, 2025
Read Entire Article